RESOLUTIONS??????

[BroMan]

newdavidfan said:

DER68 has this person seek professional help? I think she is a good candidate for the "Dr. Phil Show".... "Booty Call will not let GO"

Itz two lake! Shez gone tu far foe two long!

[Brandy]

Queenie Dr.Phil would end up throwing her ass off his show. you can't treat the mentally insane when they are tooooooooooo far gone .
she mad but she commenting on Diane's relationship with him whom she knows absolutely nothing about. on top of that she jealous and she's angry(will forever remain that way) because Diane was the woman he proposed to and not her. he knew better.
if anything is rotten in denmark it's between her legs bootycall's never give up
lol@ her writing a one page dribble..no one will publish fiction about a man who's no longer here to defend himself against lies

[der68]

common said:

der68 said:

We're referred to as the "rat pack" because we speak on HER written words. But what does she call it when post and posters from the Palace are openly discussed??? OR when statements whose idenities she does not know is stated attributed to a person whom she does not know ie;
2. When is the last time you saw David Ruffin alive?

Standing in line at the bank, Idiot!

WELL NOW TRISH, THIS IS A HUGE STATEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's only huge if you Actually know who posted it!!!!!

Let's say it together, Davey: Hi Pot, Hi Kettle! ;D ;D ;D

;D ;D ;D Hi Pot, Hi Kettle! ;D ;D ;D

[der68]

..no one will publish fiction about a man who's no longer here to defend himself against lies

Publish? I assumed she was writting this for herself. Surely this is not a "serious" effort to have a book published. ;D ;D. Like I said in another thread,If every woman that was with David wrote a book this world couldn't hold them. ;D ;D
But ((Brandy)) I think she's telling the truth about how she met him. I don't think she would admit to pursuing him if it wasn't true.
Come on now ;D ;D ;D How many women would lie about running behind a man,until he noticed her? Naw! She ain't lying!! ;D ;D ;D

[der68]

broman said:

newdavidfan said:

One word "Pitiful"

One Bigga wurd EAZY!!!! Mr. Ruffin probly noed afta da furst 2 nites. I betcha dey got buzy az soon az he notised hur!

DUH!!!!!! She wasn't running back and forth to that club to get his autograph! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
I know this type of thing is common place now, women meeting celebrites and getting with them. But "most" women were a little more "Chaste" in the 70's. Or at least that's what I thought! We weren't that er...um... "liberated" then. ;D ;D

[SarahLee]

Aww man! This must have been over looked Because I never saw a answer So I'll ask a 2nd Time

Question??
Why did David hold onto Eddie and DE's money for 2 weeks? Why didn't he give Eddie's share to Tunis as Eddie had requested? Why did he tell TT he hadn't spent any of (his) share of the money,even though he said he'd been shopping? IF he didn't touch his share of the money to shop..... Whose money was he spending?
Why do people refer to the missing money as David Ruffin's money? Wasn't 2/3 of it Kendricks and Edwards?
Are David Ruffin's heirs the only ones entiltled to 1/3 of 45,000?? Wasn't Eddie's kids and the only survivor Dennis Edwards deprived of their share of the money? And Lastly According to Murrell he had the money and gave it back to David AND According to Murrell, he told Eddie, “I see your cash” IF these statements are being treated as fact,then WHY are his other statements being called into question??

Things that make you go hmmm

[SarahLee]

der68 said:

..no one will publish fiction about a man who's no longer here to defend himself against lies

Publish? I assumed she was writting this for herself. Surely this is not a "serious" effort to have a book published. ;D ;D. Like I said in another thread,If every woman that was with David wrote a book this world couldn't hold them. ;D ;D
But ((Brandy)) I think she's telling the truth about how she met him. I don't think she would admit to pursuing him if it wasn't true.
Come on now ;D ;D ;D How many women would lie about running behind a man,until he noticed her? Naw! She ain't lying!! ;D ;D ;D

Noooooo I don't believed she lied about that either. I would have doctored that story up I wouldn't want anybody to know I ran my ass to a club trying to make eye contact night after night. with a stranger.
Now that "closed" the club down story...hmmmmm
Yeah rite!!!!! . .They both were broke (her words) but the owner kicked out paying customers so they could dance ...And she danced FAST with David Ruffin?? IN PUBLIC?? She must have been a hellava dancer to attempt that!!!! Because David Ruffin could dance!!!! NO JOKE!!!!! I've seen "sistas" that couldn't keep up with David on the dance floor!
Why did David tear up the pictures the photographer took? If they were polaroids (which many were back in the day,y'all remember the club photos ;D ;D in the cardboard frame ;D ;D) WHY didn't they just buy them?(I forgot they had no money) OR keep them?(Surely they would have given them to David Ruffin) Polaroids didn't have negatives. Why would David tear them up?
If they were taken with a camera where the pictures had to be developed (which I doubt) then it wouldn't have made sense to tear up the pictures,because the photographer would still have the negatives.
Either way that particular "story" doesn't make sense. AND if it doesn't make sense it probably isn't True!

[SarahLee]

sarahlee said:

Aww man! This must have been over looked Because I never saw a answer So I'll ask a 2nd Time

Question??
Why did David hold onto Eddie and DE's money for 2 weeks? Why didn't he give Eddie's share to Tunis as Eddie had requested? Why did he tell TT he hadn't spent any of (his) share of the money,even though he said he'd been shopping? IF he didn't touch his share of the money to shop..... Whose money was he spending?
Why do people refer to the missing money as David Ruffin's money? Wasn't 2/3 of it Kendricks and Edwards?
Are David Ruffin's heirs the only ones entiltled to 1/3 of 45,000?? Wasn't Eddie's kids and the only survivor Dennis Edwards deprived of their share of the money? And Lastly According to Murrell he had the money and gave it back to David AND According to Murrell, he told Eddie, “I see your cash” IF these statements are being treated as fact,then WHY are his other statements being called into question??

Things that make you go hmmm

Answers people!!!!
First Response: Question - What does any of these questions have to do when Ms. Shower's last saw David, SUNDAY, WEDNESDAY or the night he died

Excuse me,but er um I never asked WHEN Ms.Showers last saw David. I already knew the answer to that one.
BUT since you asked...Let me ask you. What does your question have to do with David's death? She wasn't in the bar was she? She wasn't in the crack house was she? Was she in the Limo ride to the hospital,nor did she accompany David to Murrells to "retrive" his money...or did she?
I couldn't have said it better. Attention like, when was the last time Ms. Showers saw David, Sunday night as she is quoted, Wednesday night as she is quoted, or until the day he passed as she is quoted?
Where is she qouted as saying until the day he passed??
What does nedra or jrs. "living"situation have to do with David's death......
I'd like to see someone "deed" Nedra and DERjr their own nice place.......I will tell everyone this, if I had a large sum of money, I'd give it to Nedra and Jr. God knows they deserve to live well

And lastly What does court dockets in reference to Lynette have to do with YOUR investigation?

Second Response-Why doesn't this person address what Murrell, Showers, Nowell and Brown said in the media and newspapers, and not what David didn't do. The statements are being treated as questions not facts, that beg for answers, why don't they answer? Instead of asking more questions as stalling mechanisms.


Well wouldn't a "logical" thinking person at least wonder What David Ruffin did or did not do would be the place to start? Wouldn't this go to David's state of mind??? I think that would also go to the "was he using" or not question. Why was he holding onto somebody else's money for 2 weeks? Eddie and Dennis didn't Entrust their money with anybody other then David Ruffin did they? I think it's very Important what David did or did not do!
I,unlike YOU have enough sense to know that Media reports are not always accurate. I have seen conflicting reports about the same events (other than this one) reported in at least 2 or 3 papers or news cast shows and reported differently in each one. Haven't YOU. Great place to start I agree but without interviewing these people....How do you know what they actually said?? Most investigators use the media as well as actual interviews to comfirm or refute accounts don't they?
As far as "stalling mechanisms" ;D ;D ;D People usually resort to those when they feel obligated or pressured to do a thing. I feel neither. Since it's never been my intent to answer any of your questions. Sorry if I ever gave YOU that impression.

[SarahLee]

DETERANCE
Are you trying to say deterrence ?
Again,since there is no Compulsion on MY part to answer any of your questions,that certainly would not apply to me.
Why didn't he give Eddie's share to Tunis as Eddie had requested?
The important fact is he didn't, he brought it to Philly and gave it to Murrell for safekeeping, (Murrell's words)

Come on is that the best YOU can do? ;D ;D ;D It's okay to say I DON'T KNOW!!!!! ;D ;D ;D

Why did David hold onto Eddie and DE's money for 2 weeks?
On Sunday night, June 2, 1991 Murrell told investigators David ask for the money "about" a week ago, maybe Murrell's knows.

YOU'RE the investigator.....Why don't YOU know?

Why do people refer to the missing money as David Ruffin's money? Wasn't 2/3 of it Kendricks and Edwards?
Are David Ruffin's heirs the only ones entiltled to 1/3 of 45,000?? Wasn't Eddie's kids and the only survivor Dennis Edwards deprived of their share of the money? Of course, again what does this have to do with what went on in Philadelphia on Friday, May 31, 1991 and June 1, 1991? DETERANCE

Great answer ;D ;D ;D ;D Let me repeat.....It's okay to say I DON'T KNOW!!!!! ;D ;D ;D

And Lastly According to Murrell he had the money and gave it back to David AND According to Murrell, he told Eddie, “I see your cash” IF these statements are being treated as fact,then WHY are his other statements being called into question??

....uh...because...they ...are...inconsistant. He knew Brown/he didn't know Brown, he last saw David Friday afternoon/others say David and Brown were there later Friday night between 10-11 p.m., He thought if David needed him, he'd call him/his first inkling something was wrong was when he called the hospital...

I agree! Sooooo why haven't you interviewed him?

Why did he tell TT he hadn't spent any of (his) share of the money,even though he said he'd been shopping? IF he didn't touch his share of the money to shop..... Whose money was he spending?
Surely he didn't fly homw without money in his pocket, he had $53 when he was dropped off at the hospital, could be have had other cash?

WOW! Great Question! YOU don't know the answer to that one either? Oh I forgot...that wasn't in any news paper articles was it??

Ohhhh! My aching Head!

Thank you for your candor I promise to never bother you with my questions again!

[Common]

Lawd have mercy! My head is spinning from this mess. SL, you need to leave it alone. We cannot win in this situation. If we answer the questions, then we're 'stalling' or 'deterring them from finding out the answers'. If we don't answer them, then we don't want to find out the truth. Either which way, we're wrong. It does not add up to me that the sole survivor, who's money is also missing, did not kick up a fuss to find out what happened. It's also telling that David's fam probably didn't bother to pursue it when it happened. Could it be that they know the 'truth' to what happened?? I mean, SL, the answers are right in front of their faces yet they refuse to see it. It's totally dismissed as if we really don't know what we are talking about. It's like going round and round in a circle. We had this same discussion last year, several times. And it's the same questions with the same answers. Lawd, it's like a dog chasin it's tail.

[SarahLee]

common said:

Lawd have mercy! My head is spinning from this mess. SL, you need to leave it alone. We cannot win in this situation. If we answer the questions, then we're 'stalling' or 'deterring them from finding out the answers'. If we don't answer them, then we don't want to find out the truth. Either which way, we're wrong. It does not add up to me that the sole survivor, who's money is also missing, did not kick up a fuss to find out what happened. It's also telling that David's fam probably didn't bother to pursue it when it happened. Could it be that they know the 'truth' to what happened?? I mean, SL, the answers are right in front of their faces yet they refuse to see it. It's totally dismissed as if we really don't know what we are talking about. It's like going round and round in a circle. We had this same discussion last year, several times. And it's the same questions with the same answers. Lawd, it's like a dog chasin it's tail.

You're right,and I will gladly take your advice. ;D ;D ;D My head is HURTING!!!! Maybe the "people" she turnt her research over to can make some sense out of it. God Bless em!
That train aint going Nowhere! ;D ;D
I'm going to leave it alone...Leave it alone....
I Promise you I'm DONE!!!!

[molly]

der68 said:

..no one will publish fiction about a man who's no longer here to defend himself against lies

Publish? I assumed she was writting this for herself. Surely this is not a "serious" effort to have a book published. ;D ;D. Like I said in another thread,If every woman that was with David wrote a book this world couldn't hold them. ;D ;D
But ((Brandy)) I think she's telling the truth about how she met him. I don't think she would admit to pursuing him if it wasn't true.
Come on now ;D ;D ;D How many women would lie about running behind a man,until he noticed her? Naw! She ain't lying!! ;D ;D ;D

[Common]

molly said:

der68 said:

..no one will publish fiction about a man who's no longer here to defend himself against lies

Publish? I assumed she was writting this for herself. Surely this is not a "serious" effort to have a book published. ;D ;D. Like I said in another thread,If every woman that was with David wrote a book this world couldn't hold them. ;D ;D
But ((Brandy)) I think she's telling the truth about how she met him. I don't think she would admit to pursuing him if it wasn't true.
Come on now ;D ;D ;D How many women would lie about running behind a man,until he noticed her? Naw! She ain't lying!! ;D ;D ;D

Watch it there, molly. With her in possession of Bees' email address list, you might get a taste of email jihad! Yall betta leave her alone! ;D ;D ;D ;D

[molly]

common said:

molly said:

Watch it there, molly. With her in possession of Bees' email address list, you might get a taste of email jihad! Yall betta leave her alone! ;D ;D ;D ;D

I can't stop laughing!!!!fnny:
OMG!!!!!! email jihad

[Brandy]

der68 said:

..no one will publish fiction about a man who's no longer here to defend himself against lies

Publish? I assumed she was writting this for herself. Surely this is not a "serious" effort to have a book published. ;D ;D. Like I said in another thread,If every woman that was with David wrote a book this world couldn't hold them. ;D ;D
But ((Brandy)) I think she's telling the truth about how she met him. I don't think she would admit to pursuing him if it wasn't true.
Come on now ;D ;D ;D How many women would lie about running behind a man,until he noticed her? Naw! She ain't lying!! ;D ;D ;D

Der68 she writing to try to have a fan following which will never f'ing happen. if anything is INCONSISTENT it's her "love story".
That's the only part she is actually telling the truth about..she STALKEDhim.
I had to show and tell folks about that pitiful rambling and after they read it I said"well,what does that look like to you?"and they all said"STALKING ;D ;D