der68
Ultimate Ruffness
Posts: 3,573
|
Post by der68 on Jan 10, 2006 12:01:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Jan 10, 2006 13:38:57 GMT -5
Thanx for the Polaroid trivia. ;D ;D ;D Fact IS David Ruffin did not know there was Polaroid film that could have been duplicated. Niether did you,until you found that on the net. ;D ;D ;D ;D But lets say you both knew this Why then didn't he just purchase the pictures as a souvineer? IF prints could be made from the film itself,then tearing up the pictures couldn't prevent copies from being made. Sooooooo portrait photographer mam...what was the point. He should have just broke the camera. Maybe he didn't want pictures of YOU and him made public. I don't know....MOST women would have been offended that the pictures were destroyed by their "date" rather than purchased. You're a very "special" person not to have let this bother you. ;D ;D ;D BTW Everybody owned a Polaroid camera back in the day! Nice Try! But your story still doesn't make sense!
|
|
|
Post by BroMan on Jan 10, 2006 14:04:03 GMT -5
I really wish she would cut to the chase and ask Diane Showers some of these idiotic questions. I've never seen such stupidity. Why don't she ask people who can give her answers instead of asking people who were not there. Ten bucks say Drex is retarded. Sup Dee-Ess! Yu hav ben misset! Onle 10 bucks? ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by BroMan on Jan 10, 2006 14:10:40 GMT -5
Is she bashed me she thinks it will take the focus off the questions. ;D ;D ;D ;D Why do I care if the "focus" is on or off the questions??? They are the same damn questions you have been asking for months. I didn't answer them then,and I wouldn't answer them now! It was never my intent to "bash" you. I was merely taking YOUR words and filtering them through common sense. These are simple questions that can be answered to David's friends and family, when she truly last saw David in person before his death. She who? You speak of David's friends and family? YOU'RE neither! Again!! What does that have to do with the events surrounding David's death? ? Don't be mad at me, it is the newspapers that printed her quotes, why didn't she correct them 14 1/2 years ago?I'm not mad at you. You entertain me, You make me laugh! I am taking what I am seeing, comparing and contrasting and asking questions to what THEY said in 1991. Why don't they answer the questions? But WHOM are you asking? Try ASKING the people that YOU bash daily! Comparing to WHAT? Contrasting to WHAT??? What YOU are doing is comparing newspaper articles with "other" newspaper articles and ASKING your posters for their opinions. Thanks for the support. More than once I have been asked why I haven't tried to speak to Showers, Murrell or Nowell. Why should I? They gave their accounts in several public medias, newspaper and television. It is those accounts and their own words that I go by, it is their words that I have used to disect the story and timelime. It is their words I used to determine if what was told was probable. Unless they are going to mutter the word "yes" to a polygraph, I have read enough of what they had to say.Speaking of inconsistancies!!!! YOU have never tried to contact Ms.Showers? YOU have never tried to contact Murrell? ? Either YOU'RE lying now of YOU were lying when YOU said YOU did! Didn't YOU atttempt to contact Ms.Showers via email? TRUTH is they IGNORED YOU. The only way to determine WHAT they actually said is to use the Work of others (newspaper and interview transcripts) and compare those with WHAT they say to YOU! YOU would rather draw your own conclusions,based on YOUR limited knowledge of the people,their lifestyles and the circumstances involved and spout senseless Rhetoric based on THAT limited knowledge. Then accuse others of "bashing" you when it's pointed out. YOU accuse US of trying to Sabotage your "investigation" HOW is that possible? WE are not involved in anyway with YOUR comedy of Erroneous thinking or speech that YOU call an investigation! And if posters on a message board can interfere with YOUR most important mission...WHAT does that say about YOU??? I couldn't have said it better. Attention like, when was the last time Ms. Showers saw David, Sunday night as she is quoted, Wednesday night as she is quoted, or until the day he passed as she is quoted? Answer this one! So you can show yourself to be the Fool of Fools that You are. Where is she qouted as saying until the day he passed??Where is she qouted as last seeing him on Wed night?Can you hear the laughter? ? I hope so...It's all for YOU!!!! Ignorant men raise questions that wise men answered a thousand years ago.
(((SL))) Puhleeze leeve thes folks along ;D ;D ;DDey dune resurted tu name callin Yu betta be kareful befoe dey steel ur emale adressk book!!! Dey iz vere dangres lik dat. ;D ;D ;D Point (out) an Prove (sumthin) both stark wit da letta P,butta day dayum sho dunt meen da same thang. ;D ;D DEW DEY? ? Lesk al go an celabrake Ms.Sandra's buthdey!
|
|
|
Post by Brandy on Jan 10, 2006 14:55:41 GMT -5
Something sounds soooo familiar! ;D ;D ;D ;D Read you will see what I mean! Der68 posted this yesterday morning 850am. No offense taken karralyn. I loved David as an entertainer too. I also loved him as a person. When David wasn't on stage he did all the day to day things that people do within a woman-man realtionship. With many ups and many downs. It was just on a larger scale.He was a people person,very funny and extremely popular,very generous,LOVED to talk and moody at times. David was the type of person that was noticed as soon as he walked into a room. I think because of his personality this would have been the case even if he hadn't been an entertainer. He was a down to earth person,but he could turn on that "star" persona too. And of course like us all he had a flip side as well. I've been asked this question many times,and I hope my answer doesn't sound vauge. But as a entertainer I could talk about his unbelievable talent all day long Because he was truly a talented man. But in terms of our relationship,it really wasn't much different than any other realtionship.I loved him very much,and I do feel blessed to have had him in my life. This was posted on that "other" bored last night! by You know who! Of course he had his short coming, we all do, but he was not as bad as some tried to project.
David was a star, but he was pretty much like your average guy when it came to our relationship. David was a down to earth person with a sweet spirt and a heart of gold. I have said this many times. He was wonderfully simple and complex at the same time...Very funny and extremely loving and caring... « Last Edit: Yesterday at 5:35pm by Jody
*****Coincidence******** I think not! Damn! Joyce is so good at stealing people words to fit her own made up fairy tale. SL she is very sickening she knew absolutely nothing about this man. she can pull out all the photos she want most of them with him high as kite cause that's the only way he could tolerate somebody as irritating and hideous as that. she's also an enabler..I wonder was her ass using too she act like it.
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Jan 10, 2006 18:06:20 GMT -5
Something sounds soooo familiar! ;D ;D ;D ;D Read you will see what I mean! Der68 posted this yesterday morning 850am. No offense taken karralyn. I loved David as an entertainer too. I also loved him as a person. When David wasn't on stage he did all the day to day things that people do within a woman-man realtionship. With many ups and many downs. It was just on a larger scale.He was a people person,very funny and extremely popular,very generous,LOVED to talk and moody at times. David was the type of person that was noticed as soon as he walked into a room. I think because of his personality this would have been the case even if he hadn't been an entertainer. He was a down to earth person,but he could turn on that "star" persona too. And of course like us all he had a flip side as well. I've been asked this question many times,and I hope my answer doesn't sound vauge. But as a entertainer I could talk about his unbelievable talent all day long Because he was truly a talented man. But in terms of our relationship,it really wasn't much different than any other realtionship.I loved him very much,and I do feel blessed to have had him in my life. This was posted on that "other" bored last night! by You know who! Of course he had his short coming, we all do, but he was not as bad as some tried to project.
David was a star, but he was pretty much like your average guy when it came to our relationship. David was a down to earth person with a sweet spirt and a heart of gold. I have said this many times. He was wonderfully simple and complex at the same time...Very funny and extremely loving and caring... « Last Edit: Yesterday at 5:35pm by Jody
*****Coincidence******** I think not! Damn! Joyce is so good at stealing people words to fit her own made up fairy tale. SL she is very sickening she knew absolutely nothing about this man. she can pull out all the photos she want most of them with him high as kite cause that's the only way he could tolerate somebody as irritating and hideous as that. she's also an enabler..I wonder was her ass using too she act like it. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;DSounds like the same person wrote both post doesn't it? Damn!!!
|
|
|
Post by Joy on Jan 10, 2006 20:16:01 GMT -5
I really wish she would cut to the chase and ask Diane Showers some of these idiotic questions. I've never seen such stupidity. Why don't she ask people who can give her answers instead of asking people who were not there. Ten bucks say Drex is retarded. $40 gees say she is retarded ;D
|
|
Common
Ultimate Ruffness
You Got To Feel It!
Posts: 7,442
|
Post by Common on Jan 10, 2006 21:14:07 GMT -5
Thanx for the Polaroid trivia. ;D ;D ;D Fact IS David Ruffin did not know there was Polaroid film that could have been duplicated. Niether did you,until you found that on the net. ;D ;D ;D ;D But lets say you both knew this Why then didn't he just purchase the pictures as a souvineer? IF prints could be made from the film itself,then tearing up the pictures couldn't prevent copies from being made. Sooooooo portrait photographer mam...what was the point. He should have just broke the camera. Maybe he didn't want pictures of YOU and him made public. I don't know....MOST women would have been offended that the pictures were destroyed by their "date" rather than purchased. You're a very "special" person not to have let this bother you. ;D ;D ;D BTW Everybody owned a Polaroid camera back in the day! Nice Try! But your story still doesn't make sense! I told yall she was a pathological liar!
|
|
Common
Ultimate Ruffness
You Got To Feel It!
Posts: 7,442
|
Post by Common on Jan 10, 2006 21:22:19 GMT -5
This all seems to be a blatant contradiction to me.
It's okay to instigate and bait people by copying and pasting their posts WITH THEIR NAMES ON IT even though, we are accused of not being able to go without saying their names for 3 days. This was almost 2 months ago.
It's okay to falsely accused somebody of posting somebody's personal business yet when they do it, it's to justify their own agenda or make charity cases out of people. Which I find quite despicable.
It's okay to call us groupies and fans yet they themselves have amassed, according to them, pictures of gravesites of singers, their music, articles and so on. But of course, "fans" & "groupies" only do that stuff.
We are constantly accused of negative behavior yet, once again, these folks who are supposed to have some type of ethics and professionalism, consistently bash, deingrate and degrade people whom they believe are part of some great conspiracy.
Now people want to tell us what we cannot say nor have an opinion yet it's fine for them to have an opinion or views about people they have never met. They say ignore us but yet they spend more time lurking over here to read these negative 'opinions & views' than managing their own board!
In the end, this whole going back & forth is pointless and stupid. What does any of this, SL's quotes, the identity of poster(s) on this board, or personal views have anything to do with supposedly solving a case? It must really be important to some people what is said here if they take the time to copy, paste, critique, analyze and dissect everything that is said. If you are suppose to be the 'professional', what does it matter what is said over here? Surely, if it was me, I wouldn't give a rat's ass what a bunch of posters have to say about my 'investigation'. I would spend my time focusing on getting the J-O-B done!! Quite frankly, I'd be too busy working my leads to even READ what somebody was saying about me & my case.
This is nothing but a game being played by these people to get attention because again, they want people here to have the same tired discussion about David's 'case'. It's a New Year and I would think that folks would spend their energies trying to get the 'answers' they are looking for than worrying about some fonts on a message board. One mo' gin!
|
|
|
Post by rayneedaze on Jan 10, 2006 22:26:58 GMT -5
I'm back i c it's the same ole thing. they really sprung on dis board. you got they noses wide open.
|
|
|
Post by Brandy on Jan 10, 2006 22:55:24 GMT -5
They're so stuck on stupid the same folks who posting as peepers on their bored talking awhole lot of but still ain't saying nothing and at this rate doing nothing ;D are the same idiots who probably joined this board under assumed names trying to get in where they could fit in.
|
|
|
Post by Brandy on Jan 10, 2006 22:57:46 GMT -5
Joyce is so good at stealing people words to fit her own made up fairy tale. SL she is very sickening she knew absolutely nothing about this man. she can pull out all the photos she want most of them with him high as kite cause that's the only way he could tolerate somebody as irritating and hideous as that. she's also an enabler..I wonder was her ass using too she act like it. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;DSounds like the same person wrote both post doesn't it? Damn!!! Sure does SL..came over stealing that woman's words like it was her actual experience. brain dead elderly folks kill me with that simple nonsense
|
|
|
Post by Brandy on Jan 10, 2006 23:00:00 GMT -5
Thanx for the Polaroid trivia. ;D ;D ;D Fact IS David Ruffin did not know there was Polaroid film that could have been duplicated. Niether did you,until you found that on the net. ;D ;D ;D ;D But lets say you both knew this Why then didn't he just purchase the pictures as a souvineer? IF prints could be made from the film itself,then tearing up the pictures couldn't prevent copies from being made. Sooooooo portrait photographer mam...what was the point. He should have just broke the camera. Maybe he didn't want pictures of YOU and him made public. I don't know....MOST women would have been offended that the pictures were destroyed by their "date" rather than purchased. You're a very "special" person not to have let this bother you. ;D ;D ;D BTW Everybody owned a Polaroid camera back in the day! Nice Try! But your story still doesn't make sense! I told yall she was a pathological liar! Yes she is. she's like the energizer bunny of lying..she just keeps lying and lying and lying and lying
|
|
|
Post by Brandy on Jan 10, 2006 23:03:43 GMT -5
I'm back i c it's the same ole thing. they really sprung on dis board. you got they noses wide open. Raynee sprung ain't the word they even have their members watching us like TNT AND CINEMAXnot our fault we're exciting and have lots to talk about. they're still their same bitter,jealous,lonely hag of a selves. nothing changed lol
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jan 10, 2006 23:05:51 GMT -5
I really wish she would cut to the chase and ask Diane Showers some of these idiotic questions. I've never seen such stupidity. Why don't she ask people who can give her answers instead of asking people who were not there. Ten bucks say Drex is retarded. $40 gees say she is retarded ;D Ladies why is the bidding so low surely we can go up a notch to 1 million she is retarded...
|
|