|
Post by Drex on Mar 16, 2010 19:39:32 GMT -5
YOU'RE the one that needs to "wake up". Why wouldn't the briefcase be returned to Daine? That was David's last known residence. You can't place Diane Showers or Murrell at the crack house or in the limo ride to the hospital. You have no idea who had possession of the briefcase during the span of time where David took ill and was taken to the hospitial. I'm sure your pea brain can't entertain the notion that if the briefcase full of money was left at the crack house it would be returned empty. Of course you have to first establish that David had the cash on him that night to begin with.Which is impossible. You are so in the weeds with all of your theorys,because you lack knowledge of the basic facts. Nobody knows what was in that briefcase but David Ruffin and the person or persons that had after it was left behind. None of these people are talking about it. Surmise all you want,but the reality is you're where you started many moons ago,and that's NOWHERE close to knowing what happened that fateful night, and You never will. Keep on saying it and maybe you will convince yourself. I do not believe the briefcase was left behind, with or without the cash David gave Murrell for safekeeping. I believe the briefcase and the money and its contents were "safely" hidden away, just not with Mr. David or at the alleged crackhouse. That story sold in 1991 but too many holes opened up the door for questions. I wonder when DS last saw Dave, really last saw him. Don't you?Why did Mr. David have traces of heroin in his body? I also believe it was a forced overdose. DS "hoped he was in a hotel jacuzzi" yeah right.
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 16, 2010 23:36:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 0:57:27 GMT -5
YOU'RE the one that needs to "wake up". Why wouldn't the briefcase be returned to Daine? That was David's last known residence. You can't place Diane Showers or Murrell at the crack house or in the limo ride to the hospital. You have no idea who had possession of the briefcase during the span of time where David took ill and was taken to the hospitial. I'm sure your pea brain can't entertain the notion that if the briefcase full of money was left at the crack house it would be returned empty. Of course you have to first establish that David had the cash on him that night to begin with.Which is impossible. You are so in the weeds with all of your theorys,because you lack knowledge of the basic facts. Nobody knows what was in that briefcase but David Ruffin and the person or persons that had after it was left behind. None of these people are talking about it. Surmise all you want,but the reality is you're where you started many moons ago,and that's NOWHERE close to knowing what happened that fateful night, and You never will. Keep on talking sweetie....deflect....traces of heroin in his body hum? Is this the best you can do drex? From all the points and or questions I just raised that lame one liner is all you have??? I will keep on talking,but it's not I that's trying to deflect. I unlike you prefer to deal with the realities of situations based on personal knowledge, or at the least credable hear say from "eye" witnessess. While you reside in the land of assumption,and theory. Using book excerpts,without interviewing the author,or relying on newspaper articles, Have you ever heard "you can't believe everything you read"? The people you have interviewed are playing the same guessing game about the events of that night,just as you are. If anybody you have supposedly spoken to had any credible information,why didn't they speak to the REAL authorities,instead of opting to share information with a criminal justice "student". Being that you didn't know David Ruffin,nor do you know enough about David Ruffin to decipher the truth from fiction, Id say you have been a easy mark for deception. Traces of heroin in his body?? I'm not a coroner nor was I present on that tragic night,but it's not uncommon for drug dealers to lace cocaine/and or crack with heroin,since heroin is the cheaper of the two. Sorta like adding bread to hamburger to strech it. It's amazing that after all these years of your futile investigation of the death of an addict you don't know this. David Ruffin died 1991,it's now 2010. If there was a cover up as you suggest, even you would have to agree it was successful. Quite impressive cover up woudn't you say? But a little too eleblorate to steal 40k. Be careful drex,your ineptitude is showing!
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 2:03:00 GMT -5
It really doesn't matter what YOU believe now does it? Especially when your beliefs are not supported by anything you can prove.. Being totally ignorant about all the events leading to and after David Ruffin's death,how pitiful you sound spouting your theory. Btw,I read what Debbie Rhone posted to you, Not much different than what everybody else has said to you, on several boards. Did you also discount what she said,because it doesn't quite fit with your theory? How can you possibly know about any holes in the reports from 1991? drex,you can't make events line up with what you believe. You're still in desperate need of some "facts". You'are and have been "talking the talk",but you're right where you were 5-6-7 years ago. Your mantra has become "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance,baffle them with bull-shit". Problem with that is the only one you're dazzling is poor dumb jody.
Actually NO drex,I don't wonder about that,because I happen to know. btw,I have personal knowledge not media reports. LMAO..you're calling him Dave now? Very familiar for a person that never met him. Why did Mr. David have traces of heroin in his body? I also believe it was a forced overdose David had no needle marks on his body ,so the herion had to be laced with the crack. If in fact traces of herion was actually found in his bloodstream. What is a forced overdose? How does one force an addict to overdose? Next you'll be saying David wasn't in the crack house to smoke crack! What was the motive drex? Was the coroner in on the conspriacy too? You're entitled to believe any cockamame BS you want. But believing something and proving something is worlds apart. Believeing BS doesn't make it so does it? [/b] Keep on saying what? I don't know what happened,nor do I profess to. But I dare say I know more about the events than you, and I haven't spent years upon years investigating. drex,how much of the 40k was hidden? Who hid it David or someone else? My hope is it was hidden in Dianes house and that she SPENT it! Every damn Dime of it! Btw ,the briefcase wasn't hidden away as you believe. It was seen in and retrived from the crack house. Did you ever find out what accidental insurance is? LMAO..I can't believe anybody with any sense is taking you seriously. Nobody that matters is that's not a belief.thats a fact. BTW what happened to your project about the glasses? ;D ;D ;D Probably is in the crapper with your investigaion. ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 2:06:25 GMT -5
Thanks to facebook I have finally found the answer! ;D ;D ;DTo quote YOU,"Yeah Right!" ;D ;D ;D You will never find the answer.
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 17, 2010 10:52:59 GMT -5
Keep on talking sweetie....deflect....traces of heroin in his body hum? Is this the best you can do drex? From all the points and or questions I just raised that lame one liner is all you have??? I will keep on talking,but it's not I that's trying to deflect. I unlike you prefer to deal with the realities of situations based on personal knowledge, or at the least credable hear say from "eye" witnessess. While you reside in the land of assumption,and theory. Using book excerpts,without interviewing the author,or relying on newspaper articles, Have you ever heard "you can't believe everything you read"? The people you have interviewed are playing the same guessing game about the events of that night,just as you are. If anybody you have supposedly spoken to had any credible information,why didn't they speak to the REAL authorities,instead of opting to share information with a criminal justice "student". Being that you didn't know David Ruffin,nor do you know enough about David Ruffin to decipher the truth from fiction, Id say you have been a easy mark for deception. Traces of heroin in his body?? I'm not a coroner nor was I present on that tragic night,but it's not uncommon for drug dealers to lace cocaine/and or crack with heroin,since heroin is the cheaper of the two. Sorta like adding bread to hamburger to strech it. It's amazing that after all these years of your futile investigation of the death of an addict you don't know this. David Ruffin died 1991,it's now 2010. If there was a cover up as you suggest, even you would have to agree it was successful. Quite impressive cover up woudn't you say? But a little too eleblorate to steal 40k. Be careful drex,your ineptitude is showing! Keep on keeping on...you have an answer for everything. If my theory is so far off base why do you contionue to attempt to explain them away? The difference is, again...I never met the man yet give a damn enough to dig until the holes are filled and the pieces are together...such reluctance on someone trying to do something right...could you not sleep?
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 17, 2010 10:54:30 GMT -5
Thanks to facebook I have finally found the answer! ;D ;D ;DTo quote YOU,"Yeah Right!" ;D ;D ;D You will never find the answer. How sick and wrong is it that you wish this....hum. Did I mention keep on talking?
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 14:51:36 GMT -5
Is this the best you can do drex? From all the points and or questions I just raised that lame one liner is all you have??? I will keep on talking,but it's not I that's trying to deflect. I unlike you prefer to deal with the realities of situations based on personal knowledge, or at the least credable hear say from "eye" witnessess. While you reside in the land of assumption,and theory. Using book excerpts,without interviewing the author,or relying on newspaper articles, Have you ever heard "you can't believe everything you read"? The people you have interviewed are playing the same guessing game about the events of that night,just as you are. If anybody you have supposedly spoken to had any credible information,why didn't they speak to the REAL authorities,instead of opting to share information with a criminal justice "student". Being that you didn't know David Ruffin,nor do you know enough about David Ruffin to decipher the truth from fiction, Id say you have been a easy mark for deception. Traces of heroin in his body?? I'm not a coroner nor was I present on that tragic night,but it's not uncommon for drug dealers to lace cocaine/and or crack with heroin,since heroin is the cheaper of the two. Sorta like adding bread to hamburger to strech it. It's amazing that after all these years of your futile investigation of the death of an addict you don't know this. David Ruffin died 1991,it's now 2010. If there was a cover up as you suggest, even you would have to agree it was successful. Quite impressive cover up woudn't you say? But a little too eleblorate to steal 40k. Be careful drex,your ineptitude is showing! Keep on keeping on...you have an answer for everything. If my theory is so far off base why do you contionue to attempt to explain them away? The difference is, again...I never met the man yet give a damn enough to dig until the holes are filled and the pieces are together...such reluctance on someone trying to do something right...could you not sleep? To be honest drex,I bring light to your ridiculous theories to embarrass you. Another reason is because of your insistance in posting your BS rhetoric on a board where you have been asked many times not to. If your theory is so right on,why haven't you taken your ;D ;D findings ;D ;D to the authorites? Dont' try to answer, that was retorical we all know why you haven't. ;D ;D ;D It's not David Ruffin or his death that you give a damn about, it's your blind desire to accomplish something major that drives you. YOU'RE digging for your 15 minutes of fame. YOU'RE looking for your "pat" on the back. How great it would be for YOU to do something YOU claim "trained professionals" failed to do. Dream on Dreamer. Accusing people you have never met,and your only point of reference being what YOU read in the newspaper is NOT trying to do something right. It's defamation. Re-read some of the contradictory comments you have made on this board and others. Then decide if you would like being judged soley by your words. Of course you have been judged by your words,that's why people call you a crack pot, and a fraud. Start your own board. AGAIN! Maybe you can do some damage control to your reputation.
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 15:07:59 GMT -5
;D ;D ;DTo quote YOU,"Yeah Right!" ;D ;D ;D You will never find the answer. Maybe wrong,Maybe sick, But it's the TRUTH!!!! It's not a wish it's a reality...hum. ;D ;D ;D ;DSTOP PLAYING YOURSELF! ;D ;D ;D You're not smart enough to twist my words,to aid your fantasy investigation. ;D ;D ;D I will as soon as you "Let go of your VERY OLD attempts to discredit people you don't know . To make your lame theory seem plausible. I sleep very well thanks. I'm on Vegas time! Did I mention "Keep On Digging"? Hopefully you'll find some self worth.
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 17, 2010 18:12:18 GMT -5
Keep on keeping on...you have an answer for everything. If my theory is so far off base why do you contionue to attempt to explain them away? The difference is, again...I never met the man yet give a damn enough to dig until the holes are filled and the pieces are together...such reluctance on someone trying to do something right...could you not sleep? To be honest drex,I bring light to your ridiculous theories to embarrass you. Another reason is because of your insistance in posting your BS rhetoric on a board where you have been asked many times not to. If your theory is so right on,why haven't you taken your ;D ;D findings ;D ;D to the authorites? Dont' try to answer, that was retorical we all know why you haven't. ;D ;D ;D It's not David Ruffin or his death that you give a damn about, it's your blind desire to accomplish something major that drives you. YOU'RE digging for your 15 minutes of fame. YOU'RE looking for your "pat" on the back. How great it would be for YOU to do something YOU claim "trained professionals" failed to do. Dream on Dreamer. Accusing people you have never met,and your only point of reference being what YOU read in the newspaper is NOT trying to do something right. It's defamation. Re-read some of the contradictory comments you have made on this board and others. Then decide if you would like being judged soley by your words. Of course you have been judged by your words,that's why people call you a crack pot, and a fraud. Start your own board. AGAIN! Maybe you can do some damage control to your reputation. "...it's your blind desire to accomplish something major that drives you. YOU'RE digging for your 15 minutes of fame. YOU'RE looking for your "pat" on the back. How great it would be for YOU to do something YOU claim "trained professionals" failed to do. Dream on Dreamer."- Is that like submitting photos of DS and David alluding the public that they were still in a relationship? Or, the photo op or her taken in the back of Murrell's limousine, also the last person to have the CASH? Or, the Entertainment Tonight segment where she walks up the sidewalk, looing over her right shoulder.... that type of 15 minutes of fame on the tail end of a relationship and life of a popular singer. Really?
|
|
|
Post by Duchess on Mar 17, 2010 19:07:47 GMT -5
Sarah Lee, I understand where you are coming from and why you keep responding, but Drex doesn't have sense enough to understand logic, rationality, or anything that makes any kind of sense...she just REALLY doesn't get it; it doesn't click in her so-called brain. The thing that cracks me up is how is someone that reads and writes on a second or third grade level going to decipher and read between the lines of all these news articles? LOL! How the hell is the dyslexic, barely literate, retard going to disprove anything or anyone? LOL! This is pure comedy! I bet wherever David is, he is laughing his black a$$ off at this fool Drex!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 20:06:01 GMT -5
Where do I start? [/b] So did he have it or not drex? You contradict your own foolish statements. Why are YOU so hung up on the cash? Eddie and Dennis wasn't, 2/3 of the money was theirs. Do I need to remind you the MONEY is SPENT??? I hope your inuendo about the money is correct. I hope Diane DID get the money and had a good time spending it. ET was interested in Diane,she wasn't following them,they were following her Fool! Diane was in a realtionship with a singer whose star was not rising. She will be forver known as David Ruffin's last love interest. Tail end of a relationship??? How do you know that? Prove it drex. To date Diane Showers has not litteterd the internet exploiting her relationship with David Ruffin. The same can't be said of genna or jody. As a matter of fact YOU encouraged jody to do just that. Wouldn't you agree the posting a picture of his "slippers" is a little fame searching? Yet you applauded jody for doing that. How about the half written memior jody posted on your boring board? Was she seeking her 15 min of fame? You seemed to approve of that too! At least genna and jody knew the man,your search for fame using the death of a black singer is much more offensive. Because YOU'RE arrogant enough to think your idiotic crusade is going to make a difference. Well you have gained the notoriety of being a FOOL,that cites newspaper articles and excerpts from books. Enjoy it drex, this is as good as it's going to get! The spotlight is on YOU! YOU are a internet sensation.
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 20:20:04 GMT -5
Sarah Lee, I understand where you are coming from and why you keep responding, but Drex doesn't have sense enough to understand logic, rationality, or anything that makes any kind of sense...she just REALLY doesn't get it; it doesn't click in her so-called brain. The thing that cracks me up is how is someone that reads and writes on a second or third grade level going to decipher and read between the lines of all these news articles? LOL! How the hell is the dyslexic, barely literate, retard going to disprove anything or anyone? LOL! This is pure comedy! I bet wherever David is, he is laughing his black a$$ off at this fool Drex!!! ;D Hey Duchess! I know what you're saying and your are right. I only answer theis "Bama" so that anyone reading here can see how foolish she is. She claims she post here to bring attention to her futile crusade. She trys to use this board to get "kool-aid drinker" mentalies to "follow" her. So I want her and her "fan base" to know that We know she can NOT prove a damn theory she spouts. I read Debbies post to her and I thought what she said would make drex re-examine her stupidty,since she basically said the same things everybody else has told her. But I see it didn't! A person with sense would be embarrassed,but not dumb drex... ;D ;D ;D She thinks her one-liners and her ridiiculous assumptions make her look smart,when in reality it shines a light on her ignorance. jody is the only one that thinks she's intelligent . I guess we have to consider the source.
|
|
|
Post by Duchess on Mar 17, 2010 20:58:33 GMT -5
Yes, you have to consider the source and you have to consider what this whole thing is REALLY all about...it's not an attempt to find out who "killed" David Ruffin or why, it's an attempt to bash, defame, smear, stalk, and malign Diane Showers because she's a black woman! Those two racist crackers can't stand the fact that David Ruffin went back to black...he went HOME again! ;D . So what do they do? They make up some story that David was leaving this black woman for some white chick (because that would make more sense to racist crackers than believing that he would actually stay with a woman of his own ethnicity...Oh, perish the thought!). Then they make up this story about this so-called scorned black woman becoming so irate with being "jilted" that she decided to kill him and steal some chump change from him. Does that make any kind of sense? NO, but to these two racist idiots it does. Even when the white woman that David was supposedly leaving DS for comes to this website to tell them that their theory is 100% wrong, do you think that made any difference to them? NO, because sense, logic and facts mean nothing to these two racist idiots. The mask is off, the covers have been pulled...we all know what the so-called "investigation" really is! It's nothing but a racist witch-hunt drummed up by two crackers who have it in for this black woman, Diane, simply because she had DR's heart before he died and they (or no other white woman for that matter) did, and that fact is driving them nuts! lol!
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 21:10:09 GMT -5
Yes, you have to consider the source and you have to consider what this whole thing is REALLY all about...it's not an attempt to find out who "killed" David Ruffin or why, it's an attempt to bash, defame, smear, stalk, and malign Diane Showers because she's a black woman! Those two racist crackers can't stand the fact that David Ruffin went back to black...he went HOME again! ;D . So what do they do? They make up some story that David was leaving this black woman for some white chick (because that would make more sense to racist crackers than believing that he would actually stay with a woman of his own ethnicity...Oh, perish the thought!). Then they make up this story about this so-called scorned black woman becoming so irrate with being "jilted" that she decided to kill him and steal some chump change from him. Does that make any kind of sense? NO, but to these two racist idiots it does. Even when the white woman that David was supposedly leaving DS for comes to this website to tell them that their theory is 100% wrong, do you think that made any difference to them? NO, because sense, logic and facts mean nothing to these two racist idiots. The mask is off, the covers have been pulled...we all know what the so-called "investigation" really is! It's nothing but a racist witch-hunt drummed up by two crackers who have it in for this black woman, Diane, because she had DR's heart and they (or no other white woman) did, and that fact is driving them nuts! lol! You're exactly right! I've said that for years. Funny isn't it? jody claimed he was engage to Debbie at the time of his death.I read where Debbie straightened that lie out. But the point is jody was ok that the man she was so much in love with was engaged to anybody but Diane. jody has emailed and posted 20 year old pictures of her and David all over the internet,but when pictures of David and Diane surfaced (not by Diane) drex has a problem with that. Murrell has never been implicated in David's death.Matter of fact NOBODY has,yet drex bashes Diane for riding in his limo. genna wrote about his addiction and abuse,yet they both kiss her ass. But when Diane says David never thought he woud live long (although 50 is a long time for an addict). drex makes that into something sinister. BTW Sandra Ruffin said the same thing.
|
|