|
Post by SarahLee on Apr 7, 2010 10:48:58 GMT -5
I was sent an answering machine tape of DR in March 1991arguing and being threatened by someone in Philadelphia. David made a call to Detroit and the answering machine picked up the call. David and this person continued to argue and the machine recorded it. David was threatened. He called from a landline. About the money. DS was with David a little over a year, he was with other woman much longer. Woman who bore him children and helped him. The money should have went to his children, but should it be suggested a woman should get it, there were former wives and friends who were in the trenches with David longer. Welll (((Sherlock))) David obviously didn't take the threats seriously,he wasn't in hiding in Philly. ALL addicts are threatened when they OWE money. YOU are one naive Bytch! David didn't feel any of these women shoud have gotten his money,that's why he was spending it on drugs and whatever else.Otherwise he would have shared part of HIS share with these people. He was living off DS,and btrw it was longer than a year,as if that even matters He should have contibuted to her household when he finally got money. IF supporting a addict isn't "in the trenches" I don't know what is. Only 13G was his share. Do you truly believe he wasn't spending any of his share? You keep saying missing 40G,but the truth is YOU have NO idea how much of that money was spent by David. EK and Dennis money should have gone to THEM,not Murrell,or the dope man. David had the opportunity to "enjoy" his earning's. His actions prohibited EK and DE from "enjoying" theirs. The money was David's respnsibility, If it was spent or stolen,it all comes back to David not doing the right thing by wiring it! The victims of the "missing money" were/are EK and DE. Not David! EK and DE trusted David to deliver their money. The fact that they didn't recieve their share is David's fault,NOBODY else's. But let me repeat,we don't know if EK and DE retrived what was left of their share Do we?
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Apr 7, 2010 13:10:16 GMT -5
posted: I was sent an answering machine tape of DR in March 1991arguing and being threatened by someone in Philadelphia. David made a call to Detroit and the answering machine picked up the call. David and this person continued to argue and the machine recorded it. David was threatened. He called from a landline.Maybe David regarded the so called threats as you did. Didn't you close DRU because of "threats" made against you? Funny thing about that is,you closed your board because of threats,yet YOU have posted on ,and been ran off of every David Ruffin board on the internet using the same screen name and giving out the same email address. So just how serious did you take the threats against you? OR did you close DRU due to the lack of interest in the BS you were trying to promote? YOU nor David behaved as "Threatened" people. It also seems to me that the person that "sent" you the tape,should have turned that over to the police instead of a brain dead wannabe investigator.
|
|
debbie
Junior Ruffian
Posts: 52
|
Post by debbie on Apr 11, 2010 11:38:22 GMT -5
I believe DR moved to Philly in the late summer of 89 after I put him on a plane to NY to drug treatment that he skipped out of. Give or take touring I think that was the length of time he had resided there. One thing I can say for certain is DR did not feel obligated to compensate anyone for their assistence or assist family when he was using and most of the time he was using, in that he behaved like a typical addict. Certainly the right thing would have been to contribute to the household expenses where you were residing, maybe he did and maybe he didn't ..if I were to guess he probably didn't very much, at which point one has to take personal inventory and decide if you should allow yourself to be treated as such, with that said it was Diane's choice and all others, how much they chose to put up with of DR's bad behavior. I'm sure she was trying as best she could and the fact that she had previously suffered abuses probably made her more prone to tolerate an addicts behavior and I have the utmost sympathy for her I know it was not always easy. $13,000 was nothing for DR to run through. I'm pretty confident EK and DE did not get their money. As I mentioned elsewhere I question Murell had it either he might have been covering for DR. The reason DR had the money was the promoter in England tried to pass them a check and there was concern that it would not cash stateside so DR stayed to get the money or get the promoter. He told me this himself so it's factual if one chooses to believe DR. DR was probably the best one to elect for that job. He did make it back stateside with some money intact I think. I had heard from a reliable sourch he was using while waiting to get the money and come back which would not be a good thing. I agree DR had no right to dip into anyone's money and it should have been wired Monday morning I suspect he in fact had dipped and probably had a plan to make it back. It would not be like DR to not produce the fellows monies I have never heard it said by anyone that DR stole someone elses money outright. I think some of the mystery centers around DR's activities being illegal. Certainly there are many possibilities and many unanswered questions anyone's supposition could be correct but proving so would seem like an unsurmountable hurdle. I do think David the prankster would quite enjoy leaving everyone with unanswered questions and only himself having the answers.
|
|