der68
Ultimate Ruffness
Posts: 3,573
|
Post by der68 on Jan 7, 2006 0:10:32 GMT -5
Very well stated SL. Btw I love all the qoutes. ;D I made some resolutions and have already broke them!
|
|
Common
Ultimate Ruffness
You Got To Feel It!
Posts: 7,442
|
Post by Common on Jan 7, 2006 14:29:47 GMT -5
This all seems to be a blatant contradiction to me. It's okay to instigate and bait people by copying and pasting their posts WITH THEIR NAMES ON IT even though, we are accused of not being able to go without saying their names for 3 days. This was almost 2 months ago. It's okay to falsely accused somebody of posting somebody's personal business yet when they do it, it's to justify their own agenda or make charity cases out of people. Which I find quite despicable. It's okay to call us groupies and fans yet they themselves have amassed, according to them, pictures of gravesites of singers, their music, articles and so on. But of course, "fans" & "groupies" only do that stuff. We are constantly accused of negative behavior yet, once again, these folks who are supposed to have some type of ethics and professionalism, consistently bash, deingrate and degrade people whom they believe are part of some great conspiracy. Now people want to tell us what we cannot say nor have an opinion yet it's fine for them to have an opinion or views about people they have never met. They say ignore us but yet they spend more time lurking over here to read these negative 'opinions & views' than managing their own board! In the end, this whole going back & forth is pointless and stupid. What does any of this, SL's quotes, the identity of poster(s) on this board, or personal views have anything to do with supposedly solving a case? It must really be important to some people what is said here if they take the time to copy, paste, critique, analyze and dissect everything that is said. If you are suppose to be the 'professional', what does it matter what is said over here? Surely, if it was me, I wouldn't give a rat's ass what a bunch of posters have to say about my 'investigation'. I would spend my time focusing on getting the J-O-B done!! Quite frankly, I'd be too busy working my leads to even READ what somebody was saying about me & my case. This is nothing but a game being played by these people to get attention because again, they want people here to have the same tired discussion about David's 'case'. It's a New Year and I would think that folks would spend their energies trying to get the 'answers' they are looking for than worrying about some fonts on a message board.
|
|
molly
Ultimate Ruffness
Posts: 7,446
|
Post by molly on Jan 7, 2006 16:45:29 GMT -5
This all seems to be a blatant contradiction to me. It's okay to instigate and bait people by copying and pasting their posts WITH THEIR NAMES ON IT even though, we are accused of not being able to go without saying their names for 3 days. This was almost 2 months ago. It's okay to falsely accused somebody of posting somebody's personal business yet when they do it, it's to justify their own agenda or make charity cases out of people. Which I find quite despicable. It's okay to call us groupies and fans yet they themselves have amassed, according to them, pictures of gravesites of singers, their music, articles and so on. But of course, "fans" & "groupies" only do that stuff. We are constantly accused of negative behavior yet, once again, these folks who are supposed to have some type of ethics and professionalism, consistently bash, deingrate and degrade people whom they believe are part of some great conspiracy. Now people want to tell us what we cannot say nor have an opinion yet it's fine for them to have an opinion or views about people they have never met. They say ignore us but yet they spend more time lurking over here to read these negative 'opinions & views' than managing their own board! In the end, this whole going back & forth is pointless and stupid. What does any of this, SL's quotes, the identity of poster(s) on this board, or personal views have anything to do with supposedly solving a case? It must really be important to some people what is said here if they take the time to copy, paste, critique, analyze and dissect everything that is said. If you are suppose to be the 'professional', what does it matter what is said over here? Surely, if it was me, I wouldn't give a rat's ass what a bunch of posters have to say about my 'investigation'. I would spend my time focusing on getting the J-O-B done!! Quite frankly, I'd be too busy working my leads to even READ what somebody was saying about me & my case. This is nothing but a game being played by these people to get attention because again, they want people here to have the same tired discussion about David's 'case'. It's a New Year and I would think that folks would spend their energies trying to get the 'answers' they are looking for than worrying about some fonts on a message board. Damn! Tell us how you really feel!
|
|
molly
Ultimate Ruffness
Posts: 7,446
|
Post by molly on Jan 7, 2006 17:20:06 GMT -5
I want to comment on something SL said earlier. I find it hypocritical to even fix your finger's to type the words "Property Of" when this same individual has copied,pasted,emailed and re-posted many, many post from The Palace. I find it Ludicris for anyone to think that anyone other then her and her circle of friends even give a damn about how she "hung" around a club for a week to get this mans attention.(today they call that stalking,and the people that do this they call groupies). Hold up! they called them groupies back in the day too!!! Then to re-post a message made by someone using the name Diane to show another person in a bad light. For what. OR to assume that Dee-Ess is DS and dissect her post to somehow fit with the theory that DS had something to do with his death or the money,to me is envy at it's worse. I don't know if she knew about the money or not,I don't know if she knows more about "that" night then she has told. I have read the same articles,and I agree there are many inconsistanties. But without actually speaking to the person that was qouted,how does one determine what was said??? I'm sure nobody really believes everything they read or see in the media.It's obvious that Ruffin found something about this woman that was attractive to him. He lived with her, and it was of his own free will. There are some that say he stayed with her because he didn't have anywhere else to go. Which doesn't make sense. Ruffin had many,many women that would have welcomed him back with open arms. He knew that and anybody that really knew him, knew that! I don't know Who he was returning to,Who he was in Love with,or Who he was trying to get rid of. But I know finding a damn woman to live with or live off of certainly was NOT one of his problems!
|
|
|
Post by BroMan on Jan 7, 2006 17:36:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BroMan on Jan 7, 2006 17:39:38 GMT -5
Very well stated SL. Btw I love all the qoutes. ;D I made some resolutions and have already broke them! Queenie dune broke hurs two!
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jan 7, 2006 17:57:18 GMT -5
This all seems to be a blatant contradiction to me. It's okay to instigate and bait people by copying and pasting their posts WITH THEIR NAMES ON IT even though, we are accused of not being able to go without saying their names for 3 days. This was almost 2 months ago. It's okay to falsely accused somebody of posting somebody's personal business yet when they do it, it's to justify their own agenda or make charity cases out of people. Which I find quite despicable. It's okay to call us groupies and fans yet they themselves have amassed, according to them, pictures of gravesites of singers, their music, articles and so on. But of course, "fans" & "groupies" only do that stuff. We are constantly accused of negative behavior yet, once again, these folks who are supposed to have some type of ethics and professionalism, consistently bash, deingrate and degrade people whom they believe are part of some great conspiracy. Now people want to tell us what we cannot say nor have an opinion yet it's fine for them to have an opinion or views about people they have never met. They say ignore us but yet they spend more time lurking over here to read these negative 'opinions & views' than managing their own board! In the end, this whole going back & forth is pointless and stupid. What does any of this, SL's quotes, the identity of poster(s) on this board, or personal views have anything to do with supposedly solving a case? It must really be important to some people what is said here if they take the time to copy, paste, critique, analyze and dissect everything that is said. If you are suppose to be the 'professional', what does it matter what is said over here? Surely, if it was me, I wouldn't give a rat's ass what a bunch of posters have to say about my 'investigation'. I would spend my time focusing on getting the J-O-B done!! Quite frankly, I'd be too busy working my leads to even READ what somebody was saying about me & my case. This is nothing but a game being played by these people to get attention because again, they want people here to have the same tired discussion about David's 'case'. It's a New Year and I would think that folks would spend their energies trying to get the 'answers' they are looking for than worrying about some fonts on a message board. Ain't that the truth Common!
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jan 7, 2006 17:59:19 GMT -5
I want to comment on something SL said earlier. I find it hypocritical to even fix your finger's to type the words "Property Of" when this same individual has copied,pasted,emailed and re-posted many, many post from The Palace. I find it Ludicris for anyone to think that anyone other then her and her circle of friends even give a damn about how she "hung" around a club for a week to get this mans attention.(today they call that stalking,and the people that do this they call groupies). Hold up! they called them groupies back in the day too!!! Then to re-post a message made by someone using the name Diane to show another person in a bad light. For what. OR to assume that Dee-Ess is DS and dissect her post to somehow fit with the theory that DS had something to do with his death or the money,to me is envy at it's worse. I don't know if she knew about the money or not,I don't know if she knows more about "that" night then she has told. I have read the same articles,and I agree there are many inconsistanties. But without actually speaking to the person that was qouted,how does one determine what was said??? I'm sure nobody really believes everything they read or see in the media.It's obvious that Ruffin found something about this woman that was attractive to him. He lived with her, and it was of his own free will. There are some that say he stayed with her because he didn't have anywhere else to go. Which doesn't make sense. Ruffin had many,many women that would have welcomed him back with open arms. He knew that and anybody that really knew him, knew that! I don't know Who he was returning to,Who he was in Love with,or Who he was trying to get rid of. But I know finding a damn woman to live with or live off of certainly was NOT one of his problems! J hung around the club a whole week to meet DER?
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jan 7, 2006 18:03:31 GMT -5
All the around the world the same "hoe".... All the around the world the same "hoe"....
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jan 7, 2006 18:05:47 GMT -5
Very well stated SL. Btw I love all the qoutes. ;D I made some resolutions and have already broke them! Queenie dune broke hurs two! Now you are a snitch!! Big Man I am trying to do the right thing..not call you names dang!!! Give me a break I told you I was sorry!!
|
|
|
Post by EmergingRuffian on Jan 7, 2006 18:06:06 GMT -5
ER's Manifesto! Oops, ER's New Years Resolutions!
I, ER the magnificent, resolve to continue bastardizing photographs that are posted to the world wide web, even those pictures with silly little warnings on them such as "property of ________ (insert name of silly psychotic babbling woman) .
I, ER the Great Nubian Queen, resolve to exalt the life and works of David Ruffin in the manner that I see fit without being bogged down with the memories of ranting, thread stealing, mad women from other message boards.
I, ER the omniscient and humble, resolve to protect the Palace against all enemies, foreign and domestic, by any means necessary!
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Jan 7, 2006 18:17:31 GMT -5
I see the can of Whoop Ass has been opened. Soooo let me say my qoutes bothered them But WHY????I never called anybody's name even though mine is plastered all over that bored. They had to assume I was referring to them. They made a whole thread about it. Common it's just as you said, they want to get our attention,but want to yell foul once they get it. Besides the fact they think I'm Diane Showers and Brandy,Common is Broman,and Queenie is Genna,I almost forgot they think Dee-Ess is Diane Showers too, they think Diane from the old Palace board is Diane Showers too. (Maybe they are a little obsessed with Diane Showers) I find it very telling that in moving post from their ::)YAHOO bored,they moved post they copied from The Palace. . That in itself shows their motvies and agenda. Stupid I know,but hey ! That's what they did! But I aint mad at em. I think it shows how lonely,bored and petty they are. IF indeed their purpose is to research the truth about David's death,I fail to see how what we post over here is of any interest to them. Like I said They LOVE us They really do.
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Jan 7, 2006 18:19:25 GMT -5
ER's Manifesto! Oops, ER's New Years Resolutions! I, ER the magnificent, resolve to continue bastardizing photographs that are posted to the world wide web, even those pictures with silly little warnings on them such as "property of ________ (insert name of silly psychotic babbling woman) . I, ER the Great Nubian Queen, resolve to exalt the life and works of David Ruffin in the manner that I see fit without being bogged down with the memories of ranting, thread stealing, mad women from other message boards. I, ER the omniscient and humble, resolve to protect the Palace against all enemies, foreign and domestic, by any means necessary! Thanx ER
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Jan 7, 2006 18:22:40 GMT -5
I want to comment on something SL said earlier. I find it hypocritical to even fix your finger's to type the words "Property Of" when this same individual has copied,pasted,emailed and re-posted many, many post from The Palace. I find it Ludicris for anyone to think that anyone other then her and her circle of friends even give a damn about how she "hung" around a club for a week to get this mans attention.(today they call that stalking,and the people that do this they call groupies). Hold up! they called them groupies back in the day too!!! Then to re-post a message made by someone using the name Diane to show another person in a bad light. For what. OR to assume that Dee-Ess is DS and dissect her post to somehow fit with the theory that DS had something to do with his death or the money,to me is envy at it's worse. I don't know if she knew about the money or not,I don't know if she knows more about "that" night then she has told. I have read the same articles,and I agree there are many inconsistanties. But without actually speaking to the person that was qouted,how does one determine what was said??? I'm sure nobody really believes everything they read or see in the media.It's obvious that Ruffin found something about this woman that was attractive to him. He lived with her, and it was of his own free will. There are some that say he stayed with her because he didn't have anywhere else to go. Which doesn't make sense. Ruffin had many,many women that would have welcomed him back with open arms. He knew that and anybody that really knew him, knew that! I don't know Who he was returning to,Who he was in Love with,or Who he was trying to get rid of. But I know finding a damn woman to live with or live off of certainly was NOT one of his problems! J hung around the club a whole week to meet DER? Yup!!! For TWO shows a night. I think at the same table. But I understand why....."he smiled at her" But shhhhh! we can't repeat this without Permission! Somebody Help Me Y'all!
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Jan 7, 2006 18:36:02 GMT -5
Question?? Why did David hold onto Eddie and DE's money for 2 weeks? Why didn't he give Eddie's share to Tunis as Eddie had requested? Why did he tell TT he hadn't spent any of (his) share of the money,even though he said he'd been shopping? IF he didn't touch his share of the money to shop..... Whose money was he spending? Why do people refer to the missing money as David Ruffin's money? Wasn't 2/3 of it Kendricks and Edwards? Are David Ruffin's heirs the only ones entiltled to 1/3 of 45,000? ? Wasn't Eddie's kids and the only survivor Dennis Edwards deprived of their share of the money? And Lastly According to Murrell he had the money and gave it back to David AND According to Murrell, he told Eddie, “I see your cash” IF these statements are being treated as fact,then WHY are his other statements being called into question? ? Things that make you go hmmm
|
|