|
Post by Drex on Mar 17, 2010 18:25:31 GMT -5
Your belief that someone Lied doesn't make it so. Your assumptions about the events likewise doesn't make youknowledgable or right. Of course it's about you. YOU"RE the individual that has attempted to invade "strangers" privacy and lives. You have never had any credibility or legal standing in this senario. It's not attempt to discredit you,it's the truth. There is nothing about you that would warrent anyone especially law enforcement to give you a serious thought. It's about YOU because yours is the only voice speaking with feigned authority on this matter. If it's about "learning about what was told the night he died",then it should also be about speaking to persons with actual knowledge of those events. It's about you,because in the absense of facts,you have attempted to shape a story based on your beliefs. Discredit you? There's is nothing that can be said to validate you,because you have NO credentials, No track record in solving anything other than where to eat. ;D ;D ;D Recieviing a Christmas card ;D ;D ;D from a friend or friends of David Ruffin means what? It still doesn't put you in a position of knowing him or what was going on in his personal life leading up to his death. You have no knowledge of what was going on in his and Diane's relstionship or home. How coud you? It wasn't printed in the newspaper atricles. ;D ;D ;D You're suggesting that I should Stay Focused? ;D ;D ;D This witch hunt is YOUR ridiculous crusade not mine. Since you don't know the truth, You're in no position to call anything a lie. What you need to do is get up close and personal with your need to be important, by solving a non-existant murder. Maybe then,you can come to grips with your feelings of inadequacy. because that's what this BS is about. YOU and your quest to be somebody. When jody finally wakes up and comes to the realization that you sold her a bill of goods to get her hopes up,maybe she will forgive you. She is crazy ,but conning her into thinking YOU are capable of bringing her closure,by answering questions surrounding David's death is just cruel, and low down because You're not that person. You Stay Focused, and maybe you will see yourself as the fraud that you truly are. Traces if heroin.... David: a. working again b. reportedly drug free prior to return to Philly c. reported by limousine owner he [David] returned to Philly with $40,000 cash d. planned a temp return to Detroit on Wed. June 5, 1991 e. planned to tour again in June 1991 f. went to hotel with another woman after leaving Philadelphia girlfriend g. announced he was leaving Philadelphia on Wed, May 29, 1991 h. was dropped off at ER without $40,000 cash Traces of heroin...here's my focus.
|
|
|
Post by Duchess on Mar 17, 2010 18:25:41 GMT -5
Sarah Lee, you are making very valid points, and most of all, you are MAKING SENSE! Drex doesn't understand valid points or making sense, so trying to have a conversation with her is like trying to carry on a conversation with a brick wall (a stupid brick wall at that). Sarah Lee, I hate to see you waste good sense and fonts on Drex's pointless, meritless, utterly ridiculous so-called quest for justice. Drex just doesn't understand how stupid she looks, and how stupid her whole "quest" really is...she really just doesn't get it!
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 20:26:43 GMT -5
Sarah Lee, you are making very valid points, and most of all, you are MAKING SENSE! Drex doesn't understand valid points or making sense, so trying to have a conversation with her is like trying to carry on a conversation with a brick wall (a stupid brick wall at that). Sarah Lee, I hate to see you waste good sense and fonts on Drex's pointless, meritless, utterly ridiculous so-called quest for justice. Drex just doesn't understand how stupid she looks, and how stupid her whole "quest" really is...she really just doesn't get it! LOL! don't I know she doesnt get it. But she is kind of comical isn't she?
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 20:47:06 GMT -5
[/b] a. David was working again but lets not forget he was a functioning addict. b. Reported by whom? He stoped using for periods of time,but he wasn't clean. Newsflash drex...He took ill in a CRACK HOUSE! You do know what goes on in a crack house don't you? c .David had the money for 2 weeks,was it still 40 Grand? I think not. d. AND? ?? e. So what? David Ruffin performed while he was using. Didn't you know that? f. That was not unual for David. ;D ;D ;D He was quite the ladies man. Ask jody. ;D Also refer to the answer Debbie gave you about this one. g. again AND??? h. finally a fact! he didn't have the money at the hospitial,but do we know how much money was left? You keep saying 40G...was it? I I tried to explain how the heroin may have been injested. But at this point it doesn't matter does it? Cause of death was NOT heroin but cocaine. No need to focus on the traces of heroin drex. There is NO way you can prove how it got into his system. Add that to the long list of the many other things you can't prove. Theory and assumption dont count. a .what is a accidental policy? b. how many people are involved in this conspriacy? c. Why was he in the crack house? d. When did he end his relationship with Diane? REPEAT FROM PREVIOUS POST: What you need to do is get up close and personal with your need to be important, by solving a non-existant murder. Maybe then,you can come to grips with your feelings of inadequacy. because that's what this BS is about. YOU and your quest to be somebody Focus on YOU.
|
|
|
Post by Duchess on Mar 17, 2010 21:16:34 GMT -5
b. how many people are involved in this conspriacy? According to drex, anyone who happens to be black, lived in Philly in '91, knew David Ruffin, and was supposedly scorned or used by him...but you have to be black because everyone knows that black people like to kill and steal money when they have been wronged by some drug addicted singer.
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 17, 2010 21:51:59 GMT -5
b. how many people are involved in this conspriacy? According to drex, anyone who happens to be black, lived in Philly in '91, knew David Ruffin, and was supposedly scorned or used by him...but you have to be black because everyone knows that black people like to kill and steal money when they have been wronged by some drug addicted singer. Bless Your Heart....on the above-mentioned. You tell me on "the conspriacy": a group of conspirators banded together to achieve some harmful or illegal purpose
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 17, 2010 23:32:33 GMT -5
According to drex, anyone who happens to be black, lived in Philly in '91, knew David Ruffin, and was supposedly scorned or used by him...but you have to be black because everyone knows that black people like to kill and steal money when they have been wronged by some drug addicted singer. Bless Your Heart....on the above-mentioned. You tell me on "the conspriacy": a group of conspirators banded together to achieve some harmful or illegal purpose WTH does this mean?? WOW a conspiracy to steal 40K...If it was a conspriacy it worked. Because it has never been referred to as a homocide or robbery case.Except in "drex world".
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 18, 2010 11:00:47 GMT -5
Bless Your Heart....on the above-mentioned. You tell me on "the conspriacy": a group of conspirators banded together to achieve some harmful or illegal purpose WTH does this mean?? WOW a conspiracy to steal 40K...If it was a conspriacy it worked. Because it has never been referred to as a homocide or robbery case.Except in "drex world". You typed conspiracy...I answered with a question. He died lady...the money was icing on the cake, don't cha think?
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 18, 2010 12:52:23 GMT -5
WTH does this mean?? WOW a conspiracy to steal 40K...If it was a conspriacy it worked. Because it has never been referred to as a homocide or robbery case.Except in "drex world". You typed conspiracy...I answered with a question. He died lady...the money was icing on the cake, don't cha think? You're right he did die,and the money was retrieved and SPENT. We all know that. But "...the money was icing on the cake, don't cha think"? comment would suggest YOU think he was killed for the money. Take your proof to the police and let them bring the guilty parties to justice. It's that simple. don't cha think? If you're unable to do that why keep repeating it? YOU saying it is NOT going to make it so. it just makes YOU look ridicoulous.
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 18, 2010 16:27:15 GMT -5
You typed conspiracy...I answered with a question. He died lady...the money was icing on the cake, don't cha think? You're right he did die,and the money was retrieved and SPENT. We all know that. But "...the money was icing on the cake, don't cha think"? comment would suggest YOU think he was killed for the money. Take your proof to the police and let them bring the guilty parties to justice. It's that simple. don't cha think? If you're unable to do that why keep repeating it? YOU saying it is NOT going to make it so. it just makes YOU look ridicoulous. I believe he was overdosed for two reason, that hasn't changed: money and betrayal. He announced he was leaving Philadelphia. Three people who knew David longer than DS said on my fb page, he would never 'willingly' do heroin. But of course DS would not know this because DR left her house to do drugs. You continue to say I'll never prove anything. geeezzz, where is the love for someone who thought enough to questions the answers? Why so hostile if you have no dog in this race?
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 19, 2010 0:34:32 GMT -5
You're right he did die,and the money was retrieved and SPENT. We all know that. But "...the money was icing on the cake, don't cha think"? comment would suggest YOU think he was killed for the money. Take your proof to the police and let them bring the guilty parties to justice. It's that simple. don't cha think? If you're unable to do that why keep repeating it? YOU saying it is NOT going to make it so. it just makes YOU look ridicoulous. I believe he was overdosed for two reason, that hasn't changed: money and betrayal. He announced he was leaving Philadelphia. Three people who knew David longer than DS said on my fb page, he would never 'willingly' do heroin. But of course DS would not know this because DR left her house to do drugs. You continue to say I'll never prove anything. geeezzz, where is the love for someone who thought enough to questions the answers? Why so hostile if you have no dog in this race? I never thought heroin was a drug David abused either. But the truth is unless a person was doing drugs with David,they don't know with any certainty what drug he would or would not do. Knowing David longer than Diane doesn;t mean they knew him better. He ws in a relationship with Diane,they shared her home. I will continue to say you'll never prove anything,because it's the truth,not hatefullness. You selected a "ambitious" project,that you clearly did not have the skill set to successfully complete. There is no harm in a person trying and failing. But be honest enough to own it and move on. There comes a point in every situation where ALL the puffey BS has to stop and something substinate has to emerge,unless its a Con. . Which is exactly what this is sounding like. Discussing and or debating a topic is different from making pronouncements and trying to pass them off as TRUTH.What you do is just plain sleezy. You claim to"know"so much yet you haven't gone to the authorites . If you can prove a "crime' has been committed,then that's a job for law enforcement. If you can't prove a crime has been committed,then what you think is pointless. It's ok to question what is being said or what was said,but a person with integrity doesn't twist and bend statements to fit a senario that exist only in their head. I'm not hostile. I'm not gullible either. I don't understand what there is to be gained by being a fraud. What dog do you have in this race? The man's family doesn't even take you seriously. Let me repeat, If you can prove a crime has been commited,GO to law enforcement. If you could prove robbery,then you could prove murder. If you could prove murder then you could prove robbery. You're like a dog chasing it's tail because you can't prove either. See ya!
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 19, 2010 13:56:40 GMT -5
Can't prove it - You are bold. It doesn't mean I am not right, either does it? The money was spent, of course it was. But, bold again. I like that in a person. Anywho...a vehicle was paid on, and other bills and well as many had a hand in the split.
How can I miss you if you don't go away? Holla if you have anymore.
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 19, 2010 21:45:44 GMT -5
Can't prove it - You are bold. It doesn't mean I am not right, either does it? The money was spent, of course it was. But, bold again. I like that in a person. Anywho...a vehicle was paid on, and other bills and well as many had a hand in the split. How can I miss you if you don't go away? Holla if you have anymore. You're right about one thing drex I am very bold. drex wrote It doesn't mean I am not right, either does it?You're not right Unless you can prove you're are.. It's that simple. What makes you right? Nobody walks up to you and says "You're Right" unless you prove it. I didn't make the rules,drex,that's just the way it is. drex wrote Anywho...a vehicle was paid on, and other bills and well as many had a hand in the split. How many hands can split what's left over from 40G? How much was left drex? I hope Diane got some of it. But paying bills doesn't prove she did because she was the one paying the bills before David died. But I hope if she was in on the split she got more than just enough to make a car payment. Did this latest crock of BS come to you in a dream drex? Or are you making it up like you have most of what you say? drex wrote How can I miss you if you don't go away? Holla if you have anymoredrex if you look to the left at the box thats says "author" you'll notice my name appears in gold tnat means i'm a MEMBER. Your name appears as a "guest" too bad there's not an option that says UNWANTED guest. So if you want to miss me, Its YOU that has to go away. Go to your own board,I promise I won't come there. Ha..Ha...Nobody will.
|
|
|
Post by SarahLee on Mar 21, 2010 10:40:48 GMT -5
drex it's obvious you need to acquaint yourself with the definition of defamation: 1.A false statement of fact 2.The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement.
ie: "If I can't have him nobody can"
3. Allegations that the person has committed a crime of moral turpitude ie " Anywho...a vehicle was paid on, and other bills and well as many had a hand in the split".
|
|
|
Post by Drex on Mar 21, 2010 21:35:55 GMT -5
drex it's obvious you need to acquaint yourself with the definition of defamation: 1.A false statement of fact 2.The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement.
ie: "If I can't have him nobody can"3. Allegations that the person has committed a crime of moral turpitudeie " Anywho...a vehicle was paid on, and other bills and well as many had a hand in the split". Where's your name? And, let me help you out. Defamation is the communication of a false statement of fact that causes harm to the reputation of an individual or group. Written defamation is known as libel, while verbal defamation is referred to as slander. Please, please sue me, I would love to have the media on this. A relook into his death, by whatever means is worth it all! And, I have 2 - 3" binders of all the nasty things posted about me and Jody here, in chronological order from the first day I came here...all the nasty photos that were allowed to be photo shopped...the threats if I am ever caught in a dark alley....please sue me, PLEASE!
|
|